Posts Tagged ‘IBM’

Running The Numbers - Microsoft ($MSFT) Represents Value Trading Under US$20 A Share

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

Microsoft ($MSFT) continues to trade under US$20 a share.  We have previously looked at $MSFT and felt it was undervalued in the US$20-25 range.  We decided it was time to revisit our valuation.

Valuecruncher valuation model of $MSFT with interactive assumptions

Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$25.34 for $MSFT. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a discounted cash flow model) not a target price. This valuation is 33.6% above the current share price of US$18.96.

Assumptions

  • RevenueReuters aggregates 30 analysts covering $MSFT and the mean estimate of 2009 revenues is US$67.3 billion. For our analysis we have used US$64.0 billion in 2009, US$68.5 billion in 2010 and US$72.5 billion in 2011.  Between 2004 and 2008 $MSFT grew revenues at a compound annual growth rate of 13.2% - revenues of US$36.8 billion in 2004 to US$60.4 billion in 2008.
  • Profitability: We have used an EBITDA margin of 40.0% to 2011. Reuters has $MSFT‘s EBITD margin at 39.25% last year and an average of 37.0% over the last five-years.
  • Capital Expenditure: We have assumed capital expenditures of US$3.75 billion per annum moving forward.
  • Discount Rate: 11.0%.
  • Terminal Growth Rate: 3.0%. In our assumptions we have 2010/11 revenue growth at 5.8% - we have assumed that growth eventually slows to a 3.0% long-term stable growth rate.  We have used 3.0% as our terminal growth rate.

Our analysis incorporates the cash on the $MSFT balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.

Comparator Analysis

Comparator analysis (sometimes called comparison company analysis) is a relative valuation approach. For $MSFT we looked at four peer companies - IBM ($IBM), Apple ($AAPL), HP ($HPQ) and Google ($GOOG). We calculated enterprise values - market capitalisation plus net debt (long-term borrowings less cash). Then we measured a range of metrics against the enterprise value for $MSFT and the peer set.

Microsoft Comparison on enterprise value

We have used the last financial year (LFY) as the base set of metrics. $MSFT is currently priced at the bottom of the peer group for the EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT metrics and in the middle for the EV/FCF metric.  The market is currently valuing the profits (EBIT and EBITDA) and free cash flow produced by $MSFT at less than half that of the comparable numbers for $GOOG. This reflects the perceived different future growth prospects of the two businesses.  The comparator numbers show $MSFT is comparably priced against the peer group - even with the strengths of their business model (39.8% EBITDA margins vs 18.9% for $IBM and 11.7% for $HPQ).  $MSFT’s growth is slowing - but it is still a very good business.  Should $MSFT’s profits (at the EBITDA and EBIT levels) really be valued less than $IBM and $HPQ?

Play with our assumptions – what does your analysis say? We think that $MSFT looks undervalued.  Our model is interactive - you can change any of our assumptions.

Disclosure: None


More on this topic (What's this?)
Microsoft – a Solid Investment in Technology
Microsoft (MSFT): For The Brave Buying Stocks
Read more on Microsoft at Wikinvest

Running The Numbers – IBM ($IBM) trading well below intrinsic value

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

At Valuecruncher we have looked at $IBM several times.  Our valuations have been in the US$128 – US$141 range.  $IBM is currently trading at US$88.86 - when we looked previously $IBM was trading at US$126.52 and US$119.42.  We thought that it was time to revisit our valuation.

Valuecruncher valuation model of $IBM with interactive assumptions

Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$130.55 for $IBM. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a discounted cash flow model) not a target price. This valuation is 46.9% above the current share price of US$88.86.

Assumptions

  • Revenue: Reuters aggregates 17 analysts covering $IBM and these analysts have mean estimates of 2008 and 2009 revenues of US$106.7 billion and US$111.7 billion respectively. For our analysis we have used US$105.0 billion in 2008, US$106.5 billion in 2009 and US$110.0 billion in 2010.
  • Profitability: We have used an EBITDA margin of 20% flat to 2010. Reuters has $IBM‘s EBITD margin at 20.26% last year.
  • Capital Expenditure: We have assumed capital expenditures of US$5.0 billion in 2008 and 2009 rising to US$5.5 billion in 2010 and beyond.
  • Discount Rate: 10.5%.
  • Terminal Growth Rate: 3.0%.

Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt the $IBM balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.

Play with our assumptions – what does your analysis say?

Disclosure: None

 

Running The Numbers – IBM ($IBM) Is Cheap

Monday, September 29th, 2008

Valuecruncher has previously completed a valuation of $IBM. $IBM was trading at US$126.52 when we completed that valuation. Our valuation was US$141.42. With $IBM trading at US$119.42 we thought it was time to update this valuation.

Valuecruncher valuation model of $IBM with interactive assumptions

Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$128.25 for $IBM. This is a current valuation not a target price. This valuation is 7.4% above the current share price of US$119.42.

Assumptions

Our assumptions are revenues of US$105.0 billion in 2008 growing to US$115.0 billion in 2010. This growth is a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5% for 2007-10 this compares to a 4% CAGR from 2005-7. We have used a flat EBITDA margin of 20% to 2010. We used a terminal growth rate of 3.0%. We used a terminal capital expenditure number of US$5.5 billion. We have used a WACC (discount rate) of 9.0%. All of these assumptions can be amended in the Valuecruncher on-line valuation model to adjust the valuation.

Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt on the $IBM balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.

Based on our analysis the current share price looks cheap. It appears an opportunity to be buying $IBM. Play with our assumptions – what does your analysis say?

Disclosure: None

Valuecruncher has a database of over 1,000 companies on major international exchanges. You can explore, create and share valuations for any of these companies.

IBM Still Looks Cheap At US$130 A Share

Saturday, July 19th, 2008

Last week IBM announced earnings well above expectations. IBM is trading toward the top of the stock’s 52-week range. We decided to have a look at some projected financial numbers using our on-line valuation tool to see how the share price shapes up.

IBM Valuation

IBM grew revenues from US$91.4 billion in 2006 to US$98.8 billion in 2007 – 8% year-on-year growth. Our assumptions of revenues for the next three years are US$109.0 billion in 2008 growing to US$121.0 billion in 2010 – a 7% compound annual growth rate. We have projected EBITDA margins to grow from 20.0% in 2008 to 21.0% in 2010. We have used a terminal growth rate of 3%. We used a terminal capital expenditure number of US$5.75 billion. We have utilised a WACC (discount rate) of 9%.

Valuecruncher valuation model of IBM with interactive assumptions

Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt on the IBM balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.

Our analysis gives a valuation of US$141.42 per share which is 19.3% above the current share price of US$126.52.

Based on our analysis the current share price looks undervalued. Play with our assumptions – what does your analysis say?

Valuecruncher has a database of over 1,000 companies on major international exchanges. You can explore, create and share valuations for any of these companies.

More on this topic (What's this?)
P/E Ratio Defined
Calendar Options: How We Calculate Returns
Read more on International Business Machines at Wikinvest

Subscribe

Categories