<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running The Numbers - Google ($GOOG).  When top-down analysis goes wrong.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-google-goog-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-google-goog-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recrunching Google&#8217;s Numbers - Cheap Below $370 &#124; Genuine Forex Trading</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-google-goog-when-top-down-analysis-goes-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>Recrunching Google&#8217;s Numbers - Cheap Below $370 &#124; Genuine Forex Trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=342#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>[...] last looked at Google (GOOG) in mid-December. We decided to run some numbers and have a look at the intrinsic value of the company. GOOG is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last looked at Google (GOOG) in mid-December. We decided to run some numbers and have a look at the intrinsic value of the company. GOOG is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
