<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estimating terminal growth rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: naro</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>naro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=206#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>I am doing an assignment to valuate Microsoft through having 3 different forcasted scenarios (Best, Worst, Normal) case. I calculated the WACC using 10years historical data and I got 12.11%. My problem is how to calculate the growth rate through the above different scenarios?
I calculated the average growth rate over the past 4 years and I got 20% which I feel is not logic because this means that the growth rate is less than the rate of return!!!!

Please advise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am doing an assignment to valuate Microsoft through having 3 different forcasted scenarios (Best, Worst, Normal) case. I calculated the WACC using 10years historical data and I got 12.11%. My problem is how to calculate the growth rate through the above different scenarios?<br />
I calculated the average growth rate over the past 4 years and I got 20% which I feel is not logic because this means that the growth rate is less than the rate of return!!!!</p>
<p>Please advise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=206#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I'll surf you blog. &lt;a href="http://bride-makeup.ru" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Will it be continued?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I&#8217;ll surf you blog. <a href="http://bride-makeup.ru" rel="nofollow"></a>Will it be continued?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=206#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Hi Rick,

Valuecruncher uses a perpetuity approach based on the following formula: PV(t) = FCF(t)(1+TGR)/(WACC - TGR). Applying this model to a 10 year framework results in PV(10) = FCF(10) (1 + 5%)/(WACC - 5%) where FCF(10) = FCF(9) (1 + 12%). If I was using a cap rate beyond year 10 such as a 2 times FCF multiple (arbitrary example) I would use 2 x FCF(11) where FCF(11) = FCF(10)(1 + 5%) (just take care to use the year 11 discount rate here). 

Hopefully this response is not too algebraic. The Damodaran's site (http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ ) is an excellent resource not only does it have pdf versions of his text books available it also has a number of excel worksheets.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick,</p>
<p>Valuecruncher uses a perpetuity approach based on the following formula: PV(t) = FCF(t)(1+TGR)/(WACC - TGR). Applying this model to a 10 year framework results in PV(10) = FCF(10) (1 + 5%)/(WACC - 5%) where FCF(10) = FCF(9) (1 + 12%). If I was using a cap rate beyond year 10 such as a 2 times FCF multiple (arbitrary example) I would use 2 x FCF(11) where FCF(11) = FCF(10)(1 + 5%) (just take care to use the year 11 discount rate here). </p>
<p>Hopefully this response is not too algebraic. The Damodaran&#8217;s site (http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ ) is an excellent resource not only does it have pdf versions of his text books available it also has a number of excel worksheets.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Chai</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Chai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=206#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I am doing some DCF assignment right now, had a question regarding terminal growth rate, it this rate only apply for cap rates or i should apply TGR at the last year of 10 years DCF analysis, for example, the the anual growth is 12%, and terminal growth rate is 5%, is that means i should apply 5% to the last year grow of year 10, or i should apply 12% at year 10?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am doing some DCF assignment right now, had a question regarding terminal growth rate, it this rate only apply for cap rates or i should apply TGR at the last year of 10 years DCF analysis, for example, the the anual growth is 12%, and terminal growth rate is 5%, is that means i should apply 5% to the last year grow of year 10, or i should apply 12% at year 10?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
